graduate position, super fund department. Oh forgot to mention, C average as well.?
studied hard, probably got a job at commsec customer service, internal promotion?
nice try come again, anymore?
graduate position, super fund department. Oh forgot to mention, C average as well.?
studied hard, probably got a job at commsec customer service, internal promotion?
for a 'shit' uni everyone likes to call it, also 70k > any other uni grad starting salaries unless you get in IB, eng, law...ect Other wise it's high.Also 70k isn't *that* high
cool. i really dont see how this point is relevantgraduate position, super fund department. Oh forgot to mention, C average as well.
nice try come again, anymore?
Well what's it about then? Perceived intelligence or something like that?This has nothing to do with the "prestige" of the university
I might be splitting hairs here, but I would posit it's due to the course structure of UNSW and quality of education and what not, not just because it has UNSW written on the degree sheet, which is what I'd say is prestige.Well what's it about then? Perceived intelligence or something like that?
if you looked at my post, i included law.70k is about median for grad at a top-tier law firm.
Your first post said beside med, uws are bad. And i'm proving you wrong. Hows that irrelevant?cool. i really dont see how this point is relevant
Absolutely, but in all honesty most employers would hire a proven student from a non - prestigious uni then a shit one from a prestigious uni.university prestige can be a factor sometimes.
lmaohe didn't say that about UNSW and Sydney, stop making shit up
he just threw out all the spelling mistakes and the people that weren't graduates
also, i said uws is full of bads, you have not proved me wrong with your single example hence it is irrelevantYour first post said beside med, uws are bad. And i'm proving you wrong. Hows that irrelevant?
you got anymore crap you want to post? so i can rebut it again and again.
bads?also, i said uws is full of bads, you have not proved me wrong with your single example hence it is irrelevant
I picked people i know, of course only going to be 1 or 2 personalso, i said uws is full of bads, you have not proved me wrong with your single example hence it is irrelevant
I did look at your post, and I looked at your post again, and I still don't understand the point you're trying to make (other than stating facts).if you looked at my post, i included law.