krnofdrg
Mq Law Student :)
I'm planning to talk to my Extension English 2 teacher tomorrow, and the teacher who marked the other classes speeches!!
I just don't under this : "The thing that is most striking is that: He said.. "your references to techniques within the speech will be marked by the way you say it"? I mean, WTF!!
That was 8 marks - I got 7
I used sophisticated techniques, whereas others used simple techniques like "simile, metaphor..."
Also, the orginisation and development of ideas - same thing! WTF!!
It's under the marking criteria for "Content", so why is it that it was marked as presentation?!!"
If it is content, then it should marked on the basis of the "written content"....
It really doesn't matter what techniques you use. How you explain its meaning and relating back to the question is the crucial part. Markers would not award you extra or give you more privelege depending on the technique that is false.
I think your teacher is right in some way. You just need to work a tad harder