oh fuck ive been using AND for two years
TreblaUse your common sense, if you say x = a AND x = b, you are sort of implying that they simultaneously hold, which is impossible.
e.g.
(x + 1)(x - 2) = 0
x = - 1 OR x = 2 (because the x can take EITHER one (not both) of -1 or 2)
It's not technically correct to say x = - 1 AND x = 2 because you're kind of saying x = - 1 and x = 2 at the same time, i.e. - 1 = 2 which is clearly false.
The use of AND/OR here is analogous to its use in probability. When events X AND Y occur, they occur together. When events X OR Y occur, it is either one of event X or event Y only (never both together).
LOL.But there are two variables in this case.
Perhaps using AND/OR would be pretty good xD
Well that's a general example when A and B are both zero. But what I'm saying is that in solving the quadratic equation both factors cannot be zero at the same time.Trebla
I think this is not strictly correct. When A x B = 0, this can be as a result of only A = 0, only B=0 or both A= 0 and B=0. So the 'OR' should be the inclusive OR. So it can be both.
You've got a point.Well that's a general example when A and B are both zero. But what I'm saying is that in solving the quadratic equation both factors cannot be zero at the same time.
e.g. (x + 1)(x - 2) = 0
There is no way that x + 1 = 0 and x - 2 = 0 together for the same value of x.
just use the comma