yeah samePantera said:I kinda got over study the first week of HSC so I didn't really do any. Got through this question on general knowledge, it was pretty easy.
My basic line of argument was that the failures outweight the successes because it was inherently flawed and undermined from the start.jimmyb8 said:everyone in my class laughed at me when i said i spent a long time preping totalitarianism.. they are like "your a moron they asked that in 2005"
whose laughing now haha
the other question was disgusting anyway.. having to talk about the success's of weimar would be a horrible essay
Yay!! same here... Did you set it out thematically, as in economic and political problems and how they dealt with them>>>eventually the fall of weimar with hitlers rise to power...sonyaleeisapixi said:My basic line of argument was that the failures outweight the successes because it was inherently flawed and undermined from the start.
Yup! I said the only 'success' to be found in Weimar was the period of apparent stability which in turn lead to more failures and its setting up of a social petri dish for Hitlers rise.knots&crosses said:Yay!! same here... Did you set it out thematically, as in economic and political problems and how they dealt with them>>>eventually the fall of weimar with hitlers rise to power...
cool. How you feeling about ex 1 and ancient?sonyaleeisapixi said:Yup! I said the only 'success' to be found in Weimar was the period of apparent stability which in turn lead to more failures and its setting up of a social petri dish for Hitlers rise.
That was a omnomnomnom question
You're hot.sonyaleeisapixi said:I studied only for Weimar. Because patterns show theres always at least some sort of Weimar question. I just happened to have done a practise essay a couple of nights before on basically the same question, so I was like YAYILYBOS