white predator g, i have taken a read of your 2nd essay:
1. intro is ok, but you need to use more effective language of evaluation, e.g. say peter EFFECTIVELY conveys this... through the successful use of poetry etc etc (makes the marker see clearly that your using evaluation terms)
2. topic sentences need to be more detailed. instead of just ancestors explore many concepts linked to belonging, maybe something like: The Poem Ancestors helps to successfully convey a multifaceted link to belonging. (makes reader more interested)
3. you have a good analysis of techniques and good explanation.
BUT, its very disjointed, which means your argument/thesis is being lost, so i suggest connecting some of those paragraphs, and include concluding sentences which link straight back to the question.
overall, 14-15/20. < this can be easily boosted to around 17/18 just by fixing up your paragraph structure/order, adding some effective concluding sentences which link back to the question and using effective language of evaluation to show your argument more clearly.
(soz im a hard marker haha)