Did the answer have to be in a percentage?Did you guys get 100% for the debt to equity ratio
and 2.5:1 for the working ratio
I wrote that they should use performance appraisals to determine which employees are most valuable to the firm so that they can lay off the once that are incompetent. For the second one I wrote that they should have in place a solid set of grievance procedures to ensure that the disputes which arise from the reduction in the workforce are managed properly (most of the employees which are maintained will probably be concerned about the lack of job security and may engage in disputation). Also stated they should attempt to negotiate any disputes as it is both cost and time effective (if they arise).What strategies did you guys suggest for the downsizing thing? I gave them recruitment and Job Design, not sure if correct!
See this was the only short answer I was unsure about because there isn't really any specific strategies under the syllabus relating to the removal of employees in order to downsize so I named voluntary and involuntary separation as A strategy for downsizing. Probably wrong though, sort of had me thinking that one.What strategies did you guys suggest for the downsizing thing? I gave them recruitment and Job Design, not sure if correct!
wasn't there like 4-5 lines for each strategy and you only named them?? I think they were around 2-3 marks each.only did a ratio. hopefully it'll be alright!
how many marks was the downsizing question? only wrote the strategies and didnt explain them...
The cost incurred complying with CSR may not be favoured by businesses.Benefits of CSR?
Why a business may not want to comply with CSR???
I said the resistance to change due to costs and also fear of unknown.The cost incurred complying with CSR may not be favoured by businesses.
Thank god. That is what i wrote.The cost incurred complying with CSR may not be favoured by businesses.
thats what I got too. glad we could agree on something lolThe answer was 1:1