• YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

The RHS is the beta function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function, I'm I allowed to use it to prove this?
Definitely not :p
Though I am curious to see how you would do so.

EDIT: Yes that is the method that I had in mind for this question (though I didn't use the Beta function specifically), you need to 'think up of' a function such that you integrate you get the LHS, the RHS comes through.....
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Do you do this questions using the conjugate root theorem?
Well I didn't, you may find a way using it, this question is more about argument than algebraic skill (like my series question just now)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Good question but 'thinking up of' a function etc. is very tricky and I think this question would be more 4U level if you said consider hence prove etc.









































Good job.

Ah yes but I've seen 3U questions (like in 2012 Independent) where they simply replace the m with 2. Because that is easier to integrate at 3U level (substitution).

But looking at the LHS 'reminds' you with something to do with integration, which may lead to thinking of

===========







You must also prove the domain of theta.

You must be rigorous (as possible) in your approach to the operations with infinite sequences.
The mark count is an estimated length and value of the question if it appeared in a HSC exam.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Good job.

Ah yes but I've seen 3U questions (like in 2012 Independent) where they simply replace the m with 2. Because that is easier to integrate at 3U level (substitution).

But looking at the LHS 'reminds' you with something to do with integration, which may lead to thinking of

===========





You must be rigorous (as possible) in your approach to the operations with infinite sequences.
The mark count is an estimated length and value of the question if it appeared in a HSC exam.
Good question, I hope some students can make progress on it as it certainly can be done using syllabus methods.

(Just a quick note, the desired equality will only hold in the interval (0,2*pi). Using the 2pi-periodicity of the LHS and the fact that it is trivially zero at even multiples of pi this tells us what the LHS is equal to everywhere.)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Good question, I hope some students can make progress on it as it certainly can be done using syllabus methods.

(Just a quick note, the desired equality will only hold in the interval (0,2*pi). Using the 2pi-periodicity of the LHS and the fact that it is trivially zero at even multiples of pi this tells us what the LHS is equal to everywhere.)
Yep that's true, edited.
 
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
110
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I tried to sub the roots of cosx into part (ii) then differentiate but I can't get the answer yet :(
I know that I have to follow the steps blah blah blah but it can be proved much more rigorously using

There are many proofs of here http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/cillerue/Curso/zeta2.pdf









You prove basically the same way as my question lol, you just use sine instead of cosine. But of course without the assumptions and all. This was actually the original method Euler used to prove it.
 
Last edited:

study1234

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2011
Messages
181
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

(From Patel - Ex 4O Q17)

The point P (which represents z = x +iy) moves in a straight line parallel to the imaginary axis. Prove that the point Q which represents z^2 moves in a certain parabola. Find the focus. Also describe the locus of Q when P moves on the imaginary axis.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

(From Patel - Ex 4O Q17)

The point P (which represents z = x +iy) moves in a straight line parallel to the imaginary axis. Prove that the point Q which represents z^2 moves in a certain parabola. Find the focus. Also describe the locus of Q when P moves on the imaginary axis.
for some constant k, and variable t.



Then taking the parametric equations of them:







which is a parabola since k is constant and x is linear while y is quadratic.

=================



 
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
110
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon







You must also prove the domain of theta.

You must be rigorous (as possible) in your approach to the operations with infinite sequences.
The mark count is an estimated length and value of the question if it appeared in a HSC exam.
I think it should be

Can I do this using Fourier or Taylor series since they use elementary functions and some integration?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
110
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

You prove basically the same way as my question lol, you just use sine instead of cosine. But of course without the assumptions and all. This was actually the original method Euler used to prove it.
haha nice, I didn't know this was the original method. I heard that his original method wasn't very rigorous so now I know why.

Which one is your favorite method to compute ?
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

haha nice, I didn't know this was the original method. I heard that his original method wasn't very rigorous so now I know why.

Which one is your favorite method to compute ?
I quite like the original, mostly because a lot of the others are too advanced for me to understand right now haha.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top