- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Messages
- 11,591
- Location
- l'appel du vide
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2014
- Uni Grad
- 2018
Only do the questions you got wrong I think...People have said this to me. Is this legit?
Does doing them a second time actually have value?
Only do the questions you got wrong I think...People have said this to me. Is this legit?
Does doing them a second time actually have value?
I think you're off, it's really dependent on how hard the trials are each year. You can have people getting 70s in their school trial but still manage an e4.Catholic: around 80
JRAHS: around 83
SBHS: around 85
SGS: 85
Baulkham: 85
NSG: 84
NSB:85
Sydney tech: 88
I think/
Too much probability in 3u so nope and plus I like the topics of 4u such as mechanics more than calculus in physical world etc. Yes I guess its much harder cos of marking criteria and the scaling.That's strange. I would think 98 for 3u and 95 for 4u lol
Wouldn't you agree though that 95 in phys is harder than 95 in 4u?
lol the 4U paper had more probability question than 3U in 2013Too much probability in 3u so nope and plus I like the topics of 4u such as mechanics more than calculus in physical world etc. Yes I guess its much harder cos of marking criteria and the scaling.
I wanted more perms and combs tbhlol the 4U paper had more probability question than 3U in 2013
I was also under this impression.I was under the impression that for the past 5 years or so, 70%+ is almost guaranteed e4
w0t probability is like barely assessed for MX1Too much probability in 3u so nope and plus I like the topics of 4u such as mechanics more than calculus in physical world etc. Yes I guess its much harder cos of marking criteria and the scaling.
It's a linear scale. Every 3.5 raw marks = 1 HSC mark within the E4 range.I was also under this impression.
I am more thinking though, if the e4 cut-off is - as they say - around 65, then there are 35 'marks' between 90 and 100 HSC mark. Thus, does a 70 raw mark even traverse 90 to 91?
w0t probability is like barely assessed for MX1
I donno but 4u probability is more so to do with no numbers hence less mistakes and is more to do with variables so it's kinda more easier to grasp.lol the 4U paper had more probability question than 3U in 2013
yes but if they were to sit their trial at this time of year they'd probably get well in the 80sI think you're off, it's really dependent on how hard the trials are each year. You can have people getting 70s in their school trial but still manage an e4.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMHO they'd probably get a lot higher but trials are a poor reflection of how someone would actually go considering there are usually about 1-2 topics that aren't covered in the trial. I know my school hadn't done mechanics yet so if there was mechanics in the paper and people sat it now, they would probably still get around the 70s range.yes but if they were to sit their trial at this time of year they'd probably get well in the 80s
EXTENSION 2 MATHS (4U) - NB: Actual exam was out of 100.It's a linear scale. Every 3.5 raw marks = 1 HSC mark within the E4 range.
So 83% raw --> 95% aligned?EXTENSION 2 MATHS (4U) - NB: Actual exam was out of 100.
60% (raw) --> 87% (aligned)
65% (raw) --> 90% (aligned)
70% (raw) --> 92% (aligned)
75% (raw) --> 93% (aligned)
80% (raw) --> 94% (aligned)
86% (raw) --> 96% (aligned)
90% (raw) --> 97% (aligned)
93% (raw) --> 98% (aligned)
95% (raw) --> 99% (aligned)
seems reasonably accurate
Sources: Mreditor + the raw marks database
that was last year, only. keep that in mind.So 83% raw --> 95% aligned?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It seems pretty consistent with what my tutor said (86->95)that was last year, only. keep that in mind.
Have you tried these? I heard they were a bit more difficult than the HSC, if that's what you're looking for.Done every extension 2 HSC paper.
I am happy to do other schools trials, however I do not want to waste time on trials that are easier than the HSC.
What do you people recommend?