We can use the divide by on the top and bottom trick:Here's one:
reverse quotient rule:This is a cool one:
Ahahahaha...Here's one I found, might not be overly difficult. Given , evaluate
hahaha, amazing I did not know that. tbh I hate to admit it but I just looked up 'cool integrals' and found this.Ahahahaha...
Look at Post #153 of this thread, page 8. It was the first post I ever made on BoS! The notation I use is a bit complicated and could be expressed more clearly though.
Tbh I’m surprised I remembered doing it. I did that over a year ago.hahaha, amazing I did not know that. tbh I hate to admit it but I just looked up 'cool integrals' and found this.
It's more impressive than my first post which was about me complaining about not wanting to do study notes for economics lol.Tbh I’m surprised I remembered doing it. I did that over a year ago.
No idea if this is correct. Definitely a hard one.
Yup nice now for a nasty one:No idea if this is correct. Definitely a hard one.
Sqrt 1+t^2/2t + 1-t^2/2t = sqrt 1/tYup nice now for a nasty one:
Actually that’s still very ugly to integrate ripSqrt 1+t^2/2t + 1-t^2/2t = sqrt 1/t
Trivial qeru forgot about tan half angle
? its cosec^2x and cot^2x not cosecx and cotx not to mention u need the dxSqrt 1+t^2/2t + 1-t^2/2t = sqrt 1/t
Trivial qeru forgot about tan half angle
Tan half angle may or may not simplify what is meant to be integrated. Dw about my scribbling lmao. Did actually forget about the ^2 haha.? its cosec^2x and cot^2x not cosecx and cotx not to mention u need the dx
Just a question. The standard way to do this integral seems to look like a page of working at least.? its cosec^2x and cot^2x not cosecx and cotx not to mention u need the dx
I see lns looks pretty legit lol.Okay here’s my answer but it looks very VERY wrong. Don’t mock me!