contemporary issue (3 Viewers)

[nsw..wollongong]

Crimes against humanity would suck though, you become limited in what you can talk about. You can't mention slavery or anything, and Australia doesn't have many domestic examples of crimes against humanity either.

ig u can talk abt sudan, rwanda, Yugoslavia and Australia's response of economic sanctions and media

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

ig u can talk abt sudan, rwanda, Yugoslavia and Australia's response of economic sanctions and media

Not strong however. I think it'll be a broad question on international crime; they probably won't curveball us and give us a specific syllabus point with little domestic examples. But then again, it is NESA...

 

[nsw..wollongong]

Not strong however. I think it'll be a broad question on international crime; they probably won't curveball us and give us a specific syllabus point with little domestic examples. But then again, it is NESA...

yeah considering they went specific with transnational, they might go specific with crimes against int community

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

yeah considering they went specific with transnational, they might go specific with crimes against int community

Taking a look at NESA's syllabus reccomendation, and the Cambridge textbook, you can really only mention the ICC, a case like Lubanga and maybe the enactment of the Rome Statute within statute law with The International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth)? Again, if they ask a question about crimes against humanity, they are seriously screwing a lot of people over. Including me </3

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

yeah considering they went specific with transnational, they might go specific with crimes against int community

Yea cus transnational is just so much broader and stronger. Wei Tang my love <3333

 

[nsw..wollongong]

Wei Tang my love <3333

woah woah

 

[nsw..wollongong]

Again, if they ask a question about crimes against humanity, they are seriously screwing a lot of people over

exactly what nesa would do

 

[nsw..wollongong]

Taking a look at NESA's syllabus reccomendation, and the Cambridge textbook, you can really only mention the ICC, a case like Lubanga and maybe the enactment of the Rome Statute within statute law with The International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth)? Again, if they ask a question about crimes against humanity, they are seriously screwing a lot of people over. Including me </3

but in essence u can still talk abt tribunal for rwanda (genocide), ICC and Russia and role of ICJ's inclusion, sudan humanitarian crisis and role of amnesty international

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

exactly what nesa would do

"Evaluate the effectiveness of the media in dealing with factors affecting criminal behaviour"

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

"Evaluate the effectiveness of the media in dealing with factors affecting criminal behaviour"

actually that wouldn't be too bad tbh

 

[ArcaneTemplar]

but in essence u can still talk abt tribunal for rwanda (genocide), ICC and Russia and role of ICJ's inclusion, sudan humanitarian crisis and role of amnesty international

It just feels so strange to not use many domestic measures yk? If it's a question like "Assess domestic measures in responding to crimes against humanity" I will cry

 

[nsw..wollongong]

It just feels so strange to not use many domestic measures yk? If it's a question like "Assess domestic measures in responding to crimes against humanity" I will cry

fr the only thing u can talk abt then is like, media and NGOs, ig economic sanctions. its hard to not make it a human rights argument

 

[its_ace21]

Wei Tang my love <3333

 

[its_ace21]

Taking a look at NESA's syllabus reccomendation, and the Cambridge textbook,

haha we dont use a textbook i want to die we only use the teacher's booklets

 

[its_ace21]

actually that wouldn't be too bad tbh

i would die coz i focus more on legal stuff not on media

 

[tripin]

It won’t be Young Offenders - that was asked last year.

Transnational crime was last examined in 2015 and the exam committee got a big smack because if one of your options is World Order, you have an unfair advantage and 3/4 of the paper is about mainly overseas matters (Human Rights, Transnational Crime, World Order)

but it is in the syllabus so it could happen again

 

[its_ace21]

It won’t be Young Offenders - that was asked last year.

Transnational crime was last examined in 2015 and the exam committee got a big smack because if one of your options is World Order, you have an unfair advantage and 3/4 of the paper is about overseas matters (HR, Transnational Crime, WO)

but it is in the syllabus so it could happens again

i just want a cip essay im so prepared for that

 

[tripin]

i just want a cip essay im so prepared for that

Me tooooooo. Evidence, Police powers, etc. I’m so ready

 

[its_ace21]

Me tooooooo. Evidence, Police powers, etc. I’m so ready

i do bail, use of force and searches

 

[nsw..wollongong]

It won’t be Young Offenders - that was asked last year.

no the question itself wasn't abt young offenders, it just so happened that the stimulus was about age of crim responsibility, the question was abt cjs or cip