Search results

i am saying that those 'opinions and beliefs' you stated can be interpreted differently. EXAMPLE: look at malcolm turnbull who wanted to act on climate change, but was voted out of his party because of this. how can you say that every liberal politician follows the same set of explicit...

dont make comparisons like that because the context is different in both cases - fact.

you said it yourself - they are beliefs and opinions. it is a general indication for their party when compared to others. thats all. you cant say that without your statement being an opinion: that the politicians are true to the black and white print of statements which they would take as...

as usual i agree with you to an extent, but i also oppose you generally when it comes to political opinion. so are you saying health should be commonwealth controlled? both labor and liberal agree on this... yet we only have one policy - labors. liberal still fail to produce policy and that...

anybody gunno post 'i love you costello'? no? didnt think so :P

1. i dont vote. YET. 2. my parents dont really care enough to talk politics - i agree with them that so many people hate labor and liberal equally, so vote independent but we all know nobody likes the greens.

+1

turnbull has to run for a MP seat first - so i dont think he will overtake abbott this year

no u

thats open to debate :)

the point that is being made is: your source doesnt do your political position in this argument any good. this is because it is bias. we are not using any labor endorsed sources, nor is it necessary.... so i will say that the belief in education revolutions is a good one - your party says they...

because the liberal party website is trying to promote themselves through bias. they can believe in that all they like but it doesnt mean their current govt will do these beliefs justice.

exactly, it is bias therefore invalid.

finally a source. if there is another name i should have used, insert it in replacement but it doesnt take away the point i was making.

lol, hmmmm im psychic.... slugboy will oppose you?

probaly, but thats politics for you. its not about shoving quotes in peoples faces, its about adapting to change and responding appropriately.

hahahahahaha so many people say that - so ignorant..... pathetic and downright wrong.

funny how your more confident in rudd winning the elecetion than most labor voters. i never said that good PM's throw money at problems, nor would i ever say that. the context in which we find ourselves is a political debate with option A - something (rudd) and option B - nothing...

just because you say your not a conservatist doesnt mean that you wont stop arguing with me in the position that a liberal-bias conservative would take.

what does that have to do with anything??!??!!? im asking you a straightfoward question can you justify that liberal policy (in relation to the bolded) backs the written statements i quoted from you regarding "conservative beliefs"? you have two options for your response: 1. yes, and heres...