Search results

aaah Sonya.. how'd u go today? I haven't come across any of ur 'thoughts' posts today. :)

lol i did the same as u. i just had at the beginning of my intro.. said something about it and linked it back to the texts. i never really referred back to it again in my essay. however, in my opinion: the main 'meat' of the question was the part about how consideration is invited of...

i just had that starting quote as my starting line lol (maybe bad idea). and then went to on to say something like "sadly, however, such social perspectives have been deadened in the passive, inert societies which have been portrayed in BNW and BR.... bla bla". So i didn't just shove it in...

per paragraph? or in the whole response

well the title of the subject and the exam speak for themselves. lol

Re: Anyone have 4 exams this week? i've got 1 week this.. biology then 4 next week aaaaahh then chem the week after.

lol did YOU do this?

that's pretty much what i did. :)

an adviser on the HSC advice line said it is essential to include readings/productions, but make sure they do not overshadow your personal interpretation. make it as if they have enhanced your personal response only.

im dreading my DEATH block next week - monday to thursday STRAIGHT of Maths 2u, economics, maths ext 1 and IPT, all in the space of 4days. baaaaahh im gonna cark it. should be ok for bio this friday and then CANT WAIT for chem on nov 6th.

lol my writing got quite bad I think towards the last 15 minutes. i was rushing to finish my mod C. response which suckedd. but meh.. positive marking lol i feel sorry for my marker

around 83-85/105 i think. ive estimated my raw to be like 84-85/105, so hopefully will be a band 6. if not, high band 5 will suffice.

Mod A - 13 Mod B - 11 Mod C - 6

I used two, but then didn't get to do my 2nd with so much detail... I kinda ran outta time with this essay since i left it till last. I didn't get to to finish my conclusion, meh.

Re: frontline is gay i usually look at two episodes in detail.. and then two related texts. that's sufficient i believe. u can refer to a 3rd episode briefly if u have time.

well, remember the interview can also present ideas, which then the interviewee quantifies, talks about etc. for example, ur topic sentence could be incorporated with the interviewer, and then the interview could present the quote, its analysis and what it reveals. so in essence, like Rhanoct...

well it makes sense.. if you're saying enhances readers perception that.. bla bla then you are implying to the marker that, that is what u have interpreted yourself from the text. it is indeed a more sophisticated way of revealing your personal response.

i just don't know what to do....

see, the thing is i can write good essays with two readings in focus. but im worried if they give me like 8/20 since my main focus was the readings. its so unfair because 80% of our teaching program for king lear was the other readings. :cold:

validity/reliablity.. safety... method... and variables.