Search results

The cutoff is the lowest accepted UAI to get into a course (although there have been odd cases), what I'm saying is that unsw raises the UAI marks of most students by atleast 2 pts and hence makes their courses look more sought after then they really are.

I'm talking about cutoffs published in the last uac guide. What does the cutoffs before the system prove?

Noone does those courses anyway. My point is. If there was no hsc-plus scheme cutoffs would be well below usyd's. But with the hsc-plus it makes it seem as though the two are neck and neck.

C.Ronaldo missed... ...again.

Does anyone else think the hsc-plus scheme is just used to make unsw look better by having higher UAI cut-offs? Sydney has no such thing, am i correct?

Are the published cutoffs recorded by uac the UAI after the hsc-plus points have been added or before? because if it is after the possible 5 points can have been added.

Pete, mate. Get your facts straight. :rofl:.

o rly. proof?

beergarden.. please sir, do go on.

ah, thats no good. you're doing commerce at unsw ay? what major?

wow trajan, I always thought you liked your degree.

I'm doing 3u.

Does anyone know this for a fact or does it just seem that the uiversity does this?

Oh, i see. Are you currently a postgrad student? I'd like to do my postgad studies outside of Australia.

What do you mean when you say it's not as diverse? ok, I havent no intentions of going into accounting anyway. lol. Thanks gnrlies.

get an evo.

ot depends how may seeders there are.

it's kinda established when we see sid looking at picsof him and tony in hospital that it's a while afterwards.

pics plz.

we're in this together.