Search results

I am ok with negative eugenics Positive eugenics is very dangerous however...

It would be a real shame to see the SMH subdued Imagine if Moir was fired :(

haha Photocopying - 5 hours - $940 Writing your name - 10 minutes - $65 Turning on the light - 5 minutes - $30 Opening my draw - 3 minutes - $20 Closing my draw - 7 minutes - $50 Sitting down - 12 minutes - $145.....

It's a question that would vary and is best answered by the individual uni - give their law faculty a call and interrogate them until you have all the answers.

Response: 1. There are several mundane ways in which a prediction of the future can be fulfilled: -- i. Retrodiction. The "prophecy" can be written or modified after the events fulfilling it have already occurred. -- ii. Vagueness. The prophecy can be worded in such a way that people can...

I wouldn't worry about excessive essay writing, but English is very important. There is no subject in the HSC more vital to law than English, even Legal Studies. This is for a number of reasons, including: - the most obvious: law is expressed and passed on through language, recorded and...

aahahahahaha thats quality

------------ hehe

He does have "comment on North Korea," so to speak. The US have expressed their obvious disapproval but with 150,000 troops tied down in Iraq, and potential troubles with neighbouring Iran, they aren't exactly going to be flexing their muscles at this point in time. To do so would be...

why do you think results are so important :P

I have actually :P But there is a lack of precedent on this particular scope of fair dealing

I can't believe that even after the bloody Civil Liability Act, a piece of legislation filled with more holes than Santino Corleone's car, that people still want tighter negligence laws. If it's an obvious risk, you are assumed to know about it. But if it's not obvious enough, the council...

That NK announcer guy speaks like a lunatic

1. If you read the flow of the discussion, you will see that sly fly's post was a non sequitur. It was out of no-where. I merely enquired as to what the point was. 2. Everyone of my posts includes reasons - that post was a question, not a counter-argument. 3. Saying "it's my opinion so...

Yes, but subsection (b) includes fair dealing when: -- Only summary or extracts have been used so far I don't see any poor form in it - I think it is a matter of convenience. The small extract under the heading lets us have a taste of the article, to see whether we want to read it.

Yes, it does..

Yes certainly, though I believe the point is that it would be difficult not to be influenced by the extent of the injuries

Actually common law is superceded by statute. Ergo, government can set whatever laws they wish that censor or overrule freedom of speech (so long as it does not infringe upon freedom of political communication). The thread has gone off topic yes. I simply make the point that rejecting...

Though by doing something rather than nothing they may assume a responsibility If there are no flags one might not be led into believing that it is a safe place to swim The whole thing seems like a horrible affair though

Indeed I wouldn't worry frigid, there are fair dealing exceptions under Copyright. See for example CA, s42 -- One might also make a daring argument about your posts being for research or study purposes :P No :P However ripping off someone's legal disclaimer to use as your own would :)