Search results

Ahaha! That's very funny, really!

Do a google search: evolution.

----------------------- bye!

Some sense please Why do you think it is easier? It's easier to claim there is no such thing as a flying elephant, than to convince people otherwise, but that's probably because it makes little sense to believe in a flying elephant. 1. That assumes that most people who disbelieve in God are...

...................................meh

bahaha I too seek Kleaver's profound wisdom

Yes I would align myself with that. However, some considerations are to be noted: we draw many conclusions without 100% total understanding and think of them as truths. Every elephant in the world we've ever seen cannot fly. Yet can we be sure no elephants can fly? Can you really say that the...

You assert that good is relative to experience, ie. subjective. However there can be objective norms created from subjectivity, such as Kant's catergorical imperative or rule Utilitarianism. Good therefore can be defined under and objective light when looking at the overarching effect of all...

Thinking about God does indeed affect the way humans behave, and THAT is important. Lifestyles and ideologies that make up social norms and political goals will be influenced by what we believe about God. Likewise our neighbours will live out their lives according to their beliefs...

as opposed to other particular varieties..

Some competitions do!

You do not need to have done Legal Studies at all. At UNSW specifically, Foundations of Law covers everything you'll need to know, and the short introductory books such as "Understanding the Australian Legal System" -- which you can read in an hour or two -- and the couse booklet, provide...

No that is not my definition of good. You could help a murderer achieve the goal of killing thousands of people, but I would hardly consider this "good."

If you do not wish to discuss it, you are perfectly free to ignore this thread.

Moral relativism is the silliest of all ethical theories... after divine command theory

BDW seem very nice actually

"Understanding the Australian Legal System" by John Carvan is also good I believe it is structered much more clearly as well

I blame Coke Coke and their sleazy marketing campaigns

Law Workload at UNSW The workload isn't that bad, though there is a large step up in the readings when you hit second year. The quantity and depth of the reading varies: Foundations of Law Readings: 10-15 pages per class (UNSW booklet; fair bit of historical readings). Reading depth...

They ought to be dealt with at some point, moreover arguments against beliefs of God that assert an "all-good" creator can still be refuted on logical terms, not necessarily on substance (variable ideas of good and bad).