Search results

to drolle's question of 7a iii) it was pretty hard i admit, and it took me a few sec to realise but its jus a simple quadratic. all you do is multiple everything by e^y and move everything to one side to get (e^2y) - (xe^y) + 1 i think then thats a quadratic, and solve for e^y, and then...

i thought that they have a secret hate for each other, and were only being very sarcastic.

i think spice girl got it wrong=) the 4U test was way harder then the 3U test, as it should be. And i think i did ok in the 3U one i had enuf time to go throught the questions i was unsure of, and im not even going to mention how i went in 4U=) The graph in Q5. as as the chick said, is...

just like to add... last years test, even the 2000 one, was way easier then this one. at least they tested you on everything.

it was easy?!??! are you kidding? it didnt even test you on everything i admit that i hate probability and mechanics, but they only had one mechanic question, i think, a circular motion one, which was pretty simple. What happened to the resisted motions or the banked tracks?, and everything...

well, this paper was way easier then the paper one. the dialogue, image, telling stories ( i did image) was very general, so you could pretty much write anything, and i got round 10 pages in. The others especially the Wilfred Owen one was very very specific, which was very slack to those that...

well, i thought the test was kinda stupid. The comprehensions was ok, but implications? hmm, managed to shove a bit of economics into it. the reading responding and all those other ones were pretty much straight forward. but given a second chance, i would have went way better.