Search results

So it's worse than killing a fellow human being in cold blood?

You too? No way. Lol. ;)

I'd never have sex with anyone unprotected unless they were a long-term partner, I trusted them and we'd talked about our history, as others have said. Anything else is just stupid.

Exactly.

Anyone who uses youtube often enough will know that if you select a clip which contains content considered inappropriate for those under a certain age, a page asking you to confirm your birthdate will appear before you're allowed to watch the clip. So anyway, I was watching the film...

Haha. Check out the articles if you want.

Using 'gay' as an insult.

Exactly. There should not be a blanket ban on homosexual couples having IVF simply because the statistics indicate they have a higher rate of separation.

Yeah. Exactly.

Awesome. Go us! Lol.

I like your anarcho-capitalist thread.

Hey T. Thanks for the rep! :D

Oh. I'm sorry. Was that Iron, once again, reverting to a pathetic argumentum ad hominem, and completely failing to address my point, due to the fact that he could not come up with a logical counterpoint? Why, I *am* surprised.

Right then. So does that mean you wouldn't mind if others treated you really horribly? Just so long as they valued your inherently valuable 'Life'?

I would have thought that views 'equality' are inherently *part* of an attitude to 'Life'. For example, Iron, would you not suggest, with your views on abortion, that our current laws ignore the *equal* right of the embryo to have their life valued?

Scientists think that gender is influenced by two things: 1. Chromosomes (which carry the genes) - XX (girl) and XY (boy) 2. Hormones which influence the brain during pregnancy. The genes give the initial blueprint for sex characteristics. However, if, throughout the pregnancy, the baby is...

Lol. Glad you like the pic. :D And yes, equal rights for everyone. Continuing to deny homosexual couples the right to formally recognise their relationship suggests that, by nature, these relationships are inferior, which is incorrect and unfair. Now, even if certain people within the...

So true. Which is one of the many reasons the intervention was a failure. It does not teach people responsibility nor provide them with skills, simply takes a 'naughty naughty' approach by removing certain privileges and does nothing to empower them to so they can regain what has been taken.

Please explain...how can you justify this?

So true. Australia should be at the forefront of this issue, as a developed nation, we are part of a group which emits the most greenhouse gases, yet will be affected the least due to wealth. Although Australia may 'only' contribute 1%, climate change is an issue for which we need to look beyond...