Search results

Masturbation then.

You're asking me if I'm serious after you've just admitted to holding some pre-Kinsey views about homosexuality being an illness. Are you saying that everything we take pleasure from which is not to our own betterment as a species is a sickness?

No evolutionary reason for someone to like the taste of chocolate, doesn't make them sick from deriving pleasure from it.

From my knowledge of transgendered persons, if nothing was done than there would be a significant chance she would make an attempt on her life before she was old enough to give informed consent.

What about bisexuality? No Darwinian impediment to their procreation.

Humans are meant to be a certain way? As in predetermination? Life would be a lot simpler if you just started going to mass and i stopped believing i think.

He has seen a psychiatrist you clot, ffs actually read the article, particularly when it's one you've posted.

Off topic I apologize for that but Sylvester (not cosmo) Do you think homosexuality is an illness? If not, why not with bearing to your belief that transgenderism is?

Do you know what whimsy is?

I've certainly never found much use for it.

Oh that's just stupid. It's tantamount to saying a child says he's in pain but because he's been looked after perfectly well you just ignore the complaints because a child couldn't possibly know that he's fallen ill. I mean fuck off.

Yes but don't pretend you didn't bring Marx into it to try erect an attack on some sort of Lee Rhiannon leftist nutter. I'm not debating religion, I don't believe god created any humans let alone the one in question so there is no sense barking up that tree. I don't see why anyone would be...

Well then you were pretty stupid.

Marxist? You're extraordinary when you've realized you've backed a loser, you'll try and bring religion into it, when that doesn't work you'll give economics a run. Bring in national security Sylvy, come on we know you want to? Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon...

This discussion has taken on a far greater life than just that and you know it. You basically impugned anyone who has a gender change as sick.

I don't know why you're bringing religion into this and at any rate I would have thought you'd agree that someone's religious views shouldn't impact upon other peoples freedoms. That being said I've stated numerous times that I don't think there has been any divine intervention on earth since...

I can believe it from you without any real difficulty.

Well you would note with regard to aborigines that a big part of the legal classification has to do with self-identification.

Not a young earth creationist. I can not believe how backward, how anti-scientific, how hopelessly conservative your views on gender are.

That would contribute to their intellectual and emotional make up though wouldn't it?