hold it there exphate, you cannot ignore the fact that there were a few decisions went against the indian, all of which proved to be the turning points of the test. take symond's not out and dravid's out decisions by bucknor. symond went on to save aust's bacons in the first inning, and aust really steamrolled india after dravid was given out. one cannot help but think what would have happened if those decisions were given correctly.
i think india was unlucky in that regard, and probably has to right to whinge about it. but having said that, they really should have lasted the 70 odd overs with 9 wickets (minus the 1 of dravid) in hand.
there was also another issue raised - holding the catches. i believe the fielders need to be honest about their catches, and through that honesty, batsman should take their words for it.