Ziff
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Messages
- 2,366
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
The reason your language and facts are attacked is because you do not have a coherent argument.propagandhi said:howabout nazi germany? they were a right wing super power
and wouldnt it be fairly obvious from all of my screaming that i am a pacifist? i do not stand happily by while france and india have nukes, in fact i think the india pakistan situation is something incredibly volatile that should warrant even some attention by the western media.
i dunno, i think it is pointless trying to justify my political emotion to alot of you as all i seem to get is comments about my language. yeah, you have a point, it was a very sprawling emotional and badly spelt effort that i should have bothered to spell check, but i did it late, depressed and drunk, more to the point it was a rant.
rants dont have to be backed up by footnotes however if you wanna mince political with me be my guest. it was not written to become a definite article of proof of the apocalypse. i see your point, but then you must understand this wasnt written to be presented in court. it is emotional, yes, the death of human being is emotional. it is when we removed emotion from politics that death became numbers on paper and we are bought to the current day.
i may be a leftwing fuckup or whatever, i'll be the first to admit it, you dont have to be as passionate loud and longwinded as i was, but in the end, you must know that killing civillians is wrong. by killing civillians you only make more terrorists and more civillians die. no life is worth any price... NOT ANY PRICE!!
ive said my piece, and i am now sober. you want to debate, fine i'll get into that
hehe...
a night in bed with mike moore?? well as tempting as that is.... im trying to give it up.... give me Kelley from ThoughRiot instead.
Is it this?
1. Bush has been reelected.
2. This means it's the death of human beings.
3. Evangelical Christians are going to launch nuclear weapons.
4. Democracy sucks because Bush has been reelected.
5. I'm going to throw in poorly researched historical facts that don't relate to the present.
6. Now I'm going to talk about oil because it's a good idea.
Because that doesn't flow.
I mean most rants e.g. an Op-Ed column usually have facts and a clear logical argument. You can be of whatever political persuasion, I don't care, but so blatantly generalising (End of humanity because people voted Bush), making poor categorisations (the religious and Republican BS), appealing to emotions (at least that of equally ignorant extremists), making blatant causal fallacies - how will Bush's reelection lead to the appocalypse?!, outright non-sequiturs and fallacies of explaination don't help your case.
Like I said, I don't care about your persuasion, but what pisses me off is that when people shoot off their mouths like this and give their cause or "left/right wing" whatever a bad reputation.