His methods a lot better than long division and more efficient when one gets used to the equating co-effs poly method.Or you could use long division...
His methods a lot better than long division and more efficient when one gets used to the equating co-effs poly method.Or you could use long division...
"Better" is a subjective term.His methods a lot better than long division and more efficient when one gets used to the equating co-effs poly method.
Look in the Coroneos 4U book. It's there in one of the examples.How is long divison achieved? Could you show via a eaxmple?
Also this question:
. Show that as the point z describes the y axis, from the negative end to the positive end, the point Z (upper case) describes completely the circle x^2+y^2=1, in the coutner-clockwise sense.
Ive got x^2+y^2=4 as the circle, and not the question stated x^2+y^2=1. Can anyone confirm?
Also this question.
Prove that if z lies on the circle x^2+y^2=1, the points representing
lies on an orthogonal line pair.
One more:
If P, Q represent the complex no.s z, Z and
find the locus of Q as P moves on the circle |z-3|=3
LOL, that is a term commonly used for vectors in a number space and matrix algebra...don't think it's that relevant to HSCAlso this question.
Prove that if z lies on the circle x^2+y^2=1, the points representing
lies on an orthogonal line pair.
Which chapter? Its not in Imaginary thats a for sure.Look in the Coroneos 4U book. It's there in one of the examples.
reali? I thought it was just y=+-xLOL, that is a term commonly used for vectors in a number space and matrix algebra...don't think it's that relevant to HSC
Absolutely rite. Can i just ask, i did it just graphically. I was like: the locus of that was
not sure if this correct
Yep and y=+-x makes 90 degrees at centre.Orthogonal means at 90 degrees to.
Wouldn't the radius be the same, but the center be shifted, as 17/3 only shifts it?Absolutely rite. Can i just ask, i did it just graphically. I was like: the locus of that was
The locus of 1/z-3 was a circle of same centre but with radius 1/3. Hence 1/z-3 + 17/3 equals to a locaus of (x-3-17/3)^2 + y^2 = 1/9
Where did i go wrong with that method?
So how would one determine the shifted centre?Wouldn't the radius be the same, but the center be shifted, as 17/3 only shifts it?
On additional thought, I think you are right as to say that the radius changes too...So how would one determine the shifted centre?