ok thanksThats as simple as it gets I think (you can usually simplify if the inverse is in the brackets) also try using \cos^{-1}(x) to getimo looks a lot better
ok thanksThats as simple as it gets I think (you can usually simplify if the inverse is in the brackets) also try using \cos^{-1}(x) to getimo looks a lot better
lmao is the answer 0? If not, I screwed upReally cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
![]()
yeplmao is the answer 0
its not i think
wait let me see my mistaleThe answer is:![]()
The graph on desmos looks like 0?The answer is:![]()
OH IM SUCH A DUMB POO I WAS LITERALLY ATThe answer is:![]()
Wasn't that in MIt integration bee as well?The answer is:![]()
Suffering latex pain I cOH IM SUCH A DUMB POO I WAS LITERALLY AT![]()
Sexier than you will ever be.mmm yes sexy latex completed
Really cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
![]()
Or we can use the king Rule:Really cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
![]()
Exactly how I would have done it. Great minds think alike!Or we can use the king Rule:
(1)
![]()
(2)
Add 1 and 2 to get:
![]()
ik this trick is too advanced for me but pls explain the last step to inverse tan cosOr we can use the king Rule:
(1)
(2)
Add 1 and 2 to get:
![]()
So it's jsut using the resultik this trick is too advanced for me but pls explain the last step to inverse tan cos