UnleavenedBread
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2006
Re: Rudd to say Sorry on February 12
Your argument is holding onto a thread attacking a hyperbole. Fail.
A movie loosely based on a book which is based on true story from personal account is exactly what happened and obviously unbiased. And it is also obviously the best source to use.
That is how I got through my last law exam. I simply had to quote the movie script as the ratio for the case it was based on. Everyone knows that movies are the best source. They don't get manipulated at all, especially if based on hearsay.
So we discount past wrongs against immigrants that were present in the past because they haven't happened in the past few months? But we have to apologise to Aboriginals for past actions even if they weren't committed in the past few months?Optophobia said:You said:
"Cool, that happens to migrants everyday."
If it's happening everyday, then it must have happened over the past couple of months. There is no government policy in force today, which targets immigrants. The only people who target immigrants are deluded individuals.
Your argument is holding onto a thread attacking a hyperbole. Fail.
I'll assume you are unable to read so I'll restate it.Are you calling them liars? Are you saying it didn't happen like that?
A movie loosely based on a book which is based on true story from personal account is exactly what happened and obviously unbiased. And it is also obviously the best source to use.
That is how I got through my last law exam. I simply had to quote the movie script as the ratio for the case it was based on. Everyone knows that movies are the best source. They don't get manipulated at all, especially if based on hearsay.
Yawn...you're so smart having read intro to law books for policing. If only I could compete with your knowledge in the workings of governments.Enlighten me?
That's OK