Not-That-Bright said:
Is it possible... for someone using student services to get more for their money than the ammount of money they donate?
With all the political campaigns etc i'd say these people would be very rare.
A number of your comments stem from an extremely fixed, essentialist mindset, or so it appears.
In answer to the above; ofcourse you'd find students! The SRC employees staff to deal with education/welfare cases, you'd find the majority of staff in fact; this equates to hundreds of thousands of dollars. One consultation would likely merit more value than $66. These staff are seldom used for campaign purposes they are there to assist the students. More is spent employing them than is spent on campaigns!
Secondly; in regards to Indigenous Australians, unless you are one (are you?) I don't think you really have any right to comment on an extremely complex social issue such as oppression of a people for over a century. Have you tried to be actively involved in dealing with Indigenous Affairs???
With the removal of generations of a culture and society, SURELY, anyone who has a study related to psychology, anthropology or sociology (and hopefully Government) would understand that such treatment can certainly lead to social deviance etc (the inherent cause of many of those problems you've been so flippant about - health, governance, social security, employment, education etc).
And in relation to coke; I'd rather not lag a 24 pack of cans around campus every month . Espescially when considering that the lockers provided by the union wouldn't be there anymore. (yes, that's just tongue in cheek, I'm not interested in this little spat)
I feel that it is easy for you to offend so many unless you have an understanding of extremely complex underlying issues. Your assumptions can be very dangerous, don't you realise that? It is fine to have an opinion, but try to see beyond the black and white ideologies that you seem to favour so much.
I am all for listening to others opinions, otherwise I wouldn't be replying, but please perhaps it would be wiser to think a little more about an issue before disgorging such flippant material. Informed opinion warrants much more attention than ill-thoughtout commentaries.
P.S. ; apologies if I come across as tempestuous, but in all honesty I suppose I was angered to read such strong ideological standpoints without much substantive support.