Search results

indochina will def be evaluating strategys and tactics. on skibidi. edit: didnt realise exam was today, i better have been right

Yeah, but you need OOS knowledge to eliminate C and D.

Is Q8 even in syllabus? Knowing that exp(x+iy) = exp(x)exp(iy) surely isnt in the scope of 4u. I’m sure most 4u students have discovered exp(z)^n = exp(nz) doesn’t always hold true for non integers (hence demoivres only being true for integers) so to expect them to know the addition of...

If you pay for raw mark they only tell you the mark you got for each q. it looks like a table. If you pay more, they'll send you your exam responses, it looks like this (but obviously with every question You do not get feedback on your response ever. Markers don't ever write it during the...

scaling is just for atar. Alignment is for deciding your hsc marks (essentially its how they make sure a band 6 in say english is just as difficult to get each year regardless of how hard the paper is). so like a 70 in 4u last year aligned to a 93 hsc mark and that scaled to a contribution of...

yep, though you can get a good ballpark if you check what the alignment was like on rawmarks.info. I only paid for modern. 85.5 raw went to 93 HSC mark.

Its after alignment (not scaling, though the terms are often used mistakingly interchangably) has occured. if you want raw you pay nesa 29$ and they give you it

dude i got like 70 raw in 4u and got a 99 💀 other than chemistry none of my raws reached 90

Universal 4u experience. In all seriousness, still look at the qs! You might be surprised that some of the questions are way simpler than you'd think. I got more marks in q16 than in q15 in my year 💀

Nah more around a 95-6ish than 97 with those raws. Plus you have to account for there being mores stress in the exam

What the word "plane" even means is is not in syllabus, so unless its heavily scaffolded your suggestion that they derive the cartesian equation of the plane through the point normal form is silly. Unless they explicitly give you the formula n.(x-a) = 0 lmao.

nah 4k as in 4k resolution, his mastering PDF is way better quality than the pdfs you get off libgen and that

80ish +- a few marks?

Just don't get that on the HSC. Hope this helps.

yeah you only needed 61 raw for e4 in 22 and 23. my stats were similar in the leadup

The topic is in syllabus and can be assessed. All I'm telling you is they are unlikely to make you derive the x and y values here.

@WeiWeiMan Bro is gatekeeping harder than Abtin gatekept the 3u selective package and 4k mastering pdf 💀

Yeah they're in syllabus, but you will not be asked to derive the equations because thats bad exam design; since it's so much bash, it would have to be worth a fair few marks and it would be later on in the paper. No way NESA would give 6 q15 marks to rote. Theres a reason they were removed in...

Dude, syllabus is merely a suggestion, see Q14a 2022 3u exam for proof 🤪

sorry, octants.