Search results

Generally you should have done torts and preferably mooted before

who is Gulfam

Deductive arguments are arguments in which the truth of the premises is intended to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. For example: 1. All men are mortals 2. John is a man C. Therefore John is a mortal Since both 1 & 2 are true, C must be true. For a deductive argument to be good or...

Consider yourself lucky, we have to spend 3 full days or 6 half days in court and do the same thing, only with a longer word limit.

Because I transferred, altering the degree structure. In 2003 I was doing B. Information Technology at USyd, then transferred to BA/LLB, from 2004 to the present. When I was doing IT one of the electives involved business law subjects. As a result in 2003 I covered basically the whole of...

what do you mean

LOL I see my old commercial law lecturers still there, Pearl and Joe I'm sure they'll just love their new addition heh

I remember Gail gave everyone 15/20 for contracts cp, including me. :mad:

I'm doing crim and property - for property I have.. I think her name is Cathy? Anyway she's very good. I thought she was aggressive at first but now I realise she's just passionate - and teachers who are really interested in what they teach is always good. I had Ed Santow for Public -- he was...

I'm not saying that I agree on that particular issue, but sometimes government must make decisions in the best interests of the country, not just what the majority wants.

You can't do any actual law subjects without being in the Faculty of Law, ie. any subject that has the prefix "LAWS." This includes criminal law, etc. However, there are some business law courses under the School of Business Law & Taxation at UNSW which cover similar aspects of certain...

Well it is fairly certain that most of the provisions will be interpreted in line, as far as possible, with existing common law. Thus most of the cases are still very relevant. Much of the Act reaffirms certain decisions anyway.

To borrow a quote, "it's not what you know, it's what you can prove." ie. will a judge buy your story over the one advanced by your opponent, which, depending on whether you were drunk, may or may be more convincing..

Don't take this the wrong way but are you positive you were sober enough to know all this? Because I'm sure the police prosecutor will put it to you that you were just off your face.

lol conversion I'm going to steal your window!

They have to prove you broke it. You say there were cameras? Ask to see the footage of you "breaking" the glass?

Like asqy said, you shouldn't worry about the offensive language. As mentioned you could be up for assault (civil, not criminal), if you placed the person in an immediate fear of harm. However since you said you are not making a threat as to the future, rather your behavior (smashing the...

Being arts/law, from what I've done -- Love: - contracts - property - sale of goods/consumer protection Like: - public - torts Annoyed by: - crim theory. Bit of a paradox then?

The parties can change the terms of the contract by agreement. Whether you intepret this as a termination by agreement of the original contract and an incorporation of the original terms into the a new contract, or simply a modification of the original contract, doesn't seem to present any great...

...dancing?