Search results

He might if he were Gummow J at a mooting final :)

LOL I have considered carrying giantium bottles of water onto the bus soley for the opportunity of, when asked not to drink it, citing s33 of the Act, as it were - "...nothing in this clause prohibits a passenger from drinking water, or eating or drinking for medical reasons, in a bus."

I have Nemes, and I had Brown for one class. Let me just say that Brown is a really nice teacher, very open-minded. Agh.. I can't believe we have to read the whole book asq. This crime theory stuff is almost beginning to irritate me...

I would suggest Introduction to the Australian Legal System, by John Carver.

What frigid said I mean I try to help but we aren't here to do your assignments for you

I'll be judging too >:]

LOL that was capricious but funny

Unless you sign something to that effect, no. Even if it were, it would not include an assignment of title in the copyright, it would be a mere licence.

haha that's what I demanded too...

I did an intellectual property assignment on Turn-It-In a while ago Interesting legal issues.. potentially, without an express licence for the marker to use your work, there is an infringment of copyright, however unlikely

All we can conclude is that Abbott is a sanctimonious scumbag

haha "the axis of spam" is my fav

There's something almost aphrodisiacal about bantering with girl judges too :)

I knew you were going to say that :P

This poll doesn't make any sense and also where is the centrist position?

The last person who said that was pushed home in pieces inside a wheelburrow >:] nah 'twill be interesting, especially if u are in junior comp

I'm going to own you all in junior this year CONTRACTS GALORE! muahahahaha

Stop posting those damn pictures! It's infectious!

that's.... somewhat disconcerting...

That is actually one of the ways around the existing legal duty rule: terminating the contract and starting a new one. You could mention that B might try and argue it, and then explain why it would not hold up - the argument would not be convincing because A paying $500 seperately and then $1000...