Search results

I would like to see either Clinton there but I doubt America is going have a woman president anytime soon

It depends on whether you regard a foetus as a person

-------------- exactly :)

^^^^^ Hikki rocks! ^^^^^

oh no not this again

Refuting the argument on the laws of physics At its heart, it is an argument from incredulity --

yes hehe quite worrying I have always looked at Dawson in another light after I found out he dissented

They probably have the whole Goth look going too it might be an interesting juxtaposition :)

The inferences may be false, but I believe the facts are mostly genuine. Aside from freedom of expression it'd be hard to sue for defamation because Moore poses these inferences not as facts, but as questions, such as "Would it not be reasonable to suggest that Bush...", "Was Bush thinking..." etc

That's not a problem if you put them in in the first place :) imo it would still be better than our current system

I've noticed that maybe an agnostic/atheist society should put a bigger sign next to it or if you really want to piss them off, a satanic society sign

We need a bill of rights.... bloody hell if only our Constitution wasn't so stingy

excuse me? thats rather random

I prefer to regard myself as moderate, but I suppose I sit on the right a bit, voting Liberal and all. But no, I got 47/50 for 4U English, and got a "flying" 60 for 2U maths. I think there's more of a stereotype that arts students are feral lefty sorts rather than the other way around

I HIGHLY doubt the legitimacy of that test

The Bible has a number of scientific inaccuracies, for example, 1 chron. 16:30 and Ps. 93:1 state that the Earth is immobile. Science might disagree! I suppose you are saying theology in general. Well it seems that as we light up more and more of the world with science, we no longer need...

-------------- huh??

*shudders* This is like the third time it's been reported some guy's penis was cut off in the last year What the hell is going on!?

I see. I wouldn't say that necessarily makes him biased against asians though. I mean if a really poor 'white country' was making the cheap imports, it might just as well be against them.

1. Again we see a lack of substance. 2. Even if he was a hypocrite (which he isn't), it does not defeat his argument.