Search results

Ive been readying the sylabbus and i realised something that i kept overlooking. Before it actually says what the content is, it states what the case study focus's on for each section. I figure a slyabbus cant say something is the focus if it isnt, it can only question you on another focus...

try applying it to stuff you see, like an ad on tv, or a chair your sitting on. It helps you apply the stuff youve been studying, and is slightly less boring then constantly reading notes.

What about actual methods to resolve this conflict thoe?

apparently specimen is extremelyt flawd, well thats what our teacher whos a marker said

My textbook say it needs to be done and leaves it at that :( please help.

Hi, i think I know how to do a biz. report, but ive forgotten the difference between a report and an extended response. If anyone knows it would be much appreciated :)

q15) a and d are by definition in all textbooks only common to one area, the cases which show otherwise are irrelevant, thats why the question asks for common to both areas. International law is law between soverign states, and is not commonly assosiated with individuals within those states...

hey thats pretty helpful, thanks :)

they should have all sections in the same format as section II, makes it soooooo much easier if you know the content to get it across, and so much harder for people that dont know the content to get marks.

yeh i did, i forgot when it started assumed i had 10 more minutes, so instead o wrapping this up nicely, ive left this unfinished sentence and looks tupid.... oh wells !!!! NO ENGLISH EVER AGAIN!!!!

I had trouble when i saw tensions in one of the past papers, but you just look at tensions as a way of saying how their context's fears, such as industrialisation, create a tension with the wild which leads to the dystopic future and the lose of humanity as the wilderness and natiral ryhthmes...

say whatever you want for it, the markers arent going to know the production very well, and there not gonna have read many others that use it.... well i assume, so you could simply take any reading that you know a lot about and make up tecniques they could have used to emphasis your reading...

yes, yes you are :P try looking for their website or something.... im sure if you google it someone will know.

I havent seen brooke's one.... well that i can remember, but i read Miller's as a marxist production. You dont actually develope much sympathy for Lear through Millers production, whereas Kent's honour and Edmunds dishonour are emphasised. Lears even shown as being cruel to everyone in this...

What reading of king lear did nahum tate have? What context would a.c. bradley(1904 i think) have? as well as critics past the 1970's? Also when we giving our own reading and appreciation of Lear how do we discribe our context? I assume it doesnt actually want personal details. any answers...

Can anyone explain to me how 6 minutes before a question was asked the answer was posted???? Its happening everywhere. Also WHY is the answer at the top of the page before it even gets to the question????

I found section I hard too, because although all 3 had alot of tecniques, and where relevant to journeys, they didnt link the two. Like text 1 and 2, half the tecniques where trying to sell the book.

Approach it from as if it was a dairy entry for Einstein or a ship's log, make it extremely sophisticated, dont worry that it doesnt sound like you, make it sound like a genius writing in a diary

definately not, you might be able to in the module questions, but aos is very focused on the texts. If you really like it your better off stealing what the quote says and claiming it as your own. If you quote it your saying you dont actually know how the composers done it, but someone else...

Unless they let you take in drinks, in which case you could keep a constant high from energy drinks. Only drawback i can see is youd propably have diabetes as soon as the hsc is over