Search results

Heh, I went modern crazy, it's my best subject and it's gotta pull me up...Gonna fuck up legal and eco in the next two days :(. My modern teacher basically told me to spam historiog as much as I could, so I did :hat:

I used maybe 5-6 each essay (not first section though, none there). 12 is a little excessive imo, they still want your argument. I admit I could've had more myself. I DID prepare 58 quotes :D

How many quotes did you use?

Riefenstahl was beautiful... -Dancing reflected contexts of more culturally open weimar republic -early film work (pre-nazis) did this too -Nazi films obviously reflected her 'being a product of her time' -Nuba photography showed she hadn't changed, was still influenced by the contexts of her...

I've got a question: How does anyone have any idea at all? My knowledge is limited to modern's reasonable but not awesome scaling and the fact that few people get band 6s (6% ish)

I still maintain your approach is restricted because it doesn't refer to the broader picture; it's too deep in specifics imo

Yes, maybe legal aid is, but it's too similar to courts to be given with courts as one of the other reasons. Because accessing the court with a lawyer is achieving access; irrelevant of whether legal aid was used or not. Just getting down to the finer points of it.

Yeah, the question is, does access to justice mean the same thing as justice itself Edit: Thanks, Zazzy, for repeating exactly what biibii said. Though I guess it's another opinion against me, ignoring the 'access' component of the question.

But is achieving justice achieving access to justice? If so, then your criteria would mean that when a murder has been sent to gaol, justice has been accessed. Rather, in my hypothetical, justice has been achieved, however, not accessed. Do you see my point?

But that's not providing access to justice. Are you sure? I mean, ADR would probably be taken, courts would, but I still doubt legal aid and the right to appeal decisions; those aren't really example of access to justice separate from the courts system.

First of all, my advice isn't golden, I'm basically cramming atm. That's just my take on what it's asking. Legal aid encourages and enhances the ability to access through the courts systems, so if you said courts I doubt they'd also take legal aid (it's not access in itself, just a catalyst for...

heheheh I was looking at that question wondering the same thing just before. I suppose the courts system (civil law), lobbying politically through self-representation or using a local member (e.g. MPs), and maybe use of an ombudsman, or office of fair trading? I'm pretty sure either way that sir...

lol, to all you people who say it's stupid- I'm going to do it anyway. I got 85 in the trial doing that, got about 46/50 for the essays section if I recall correctly. Yeah, I know, risky. But due to time constraints I'm taking it, it's not difficult to bend arguments if you're just a little...

YES I WAS SO RIGHT. Only, A) appeasement and B) el alamein heheh

I could not have had a better exam.

did 9 pages on 6A, exposing weaknesses in the republic wasn't hard :D

I understand, heheheh. I got 28 including the 4 pages on sources, though could've been a page more if I'd finished the north africa essay

Despite last year, macroeconomic policy seems likely...What better year than this to assess it? Also external stability is probable imo, because of similar reasons in global influences. Environment has changed too much this year and future is uncertain, so I doubt it. Micro hasn't come up that...

1. No-one's ever gotten any raw marks back, so we don't really know 2. It changes year to year naturally 3. There is absolutely no possibility it would align down (i.e. that's just wrong). Why? Because it already scales badly. Scaling is based off raw marks, and so if a subject scales poorly...

I wouldn't gamble on using customary, although I can't see personally why not. But yeah, basically where laws come from (from a legal perspective).