Re: Israel & Palestine
MaNiElla said:
I seriously have no clue to how you are able to use the keyboard.
It clearly says that he didnt have aids because he had liver problems.
You also have no proof that he was an alcoholic, liver problems may happen from many different factors, such as increased levels of bilirubin in the system, viruses, poisons, the accumulation of iron, etc. Im begining to think that this whole alcohol/aids story must be started by israel to discredit and harm arafat's reputation. how mean, he's a dead man for gods sake, why dont they just leave the dead guy to rest in peace!! 
This is should clear things up a bit.
In September 2005, the Israeli newspaper
Haaretz reported that
French experts could not determine the cause of Arafat's death. The paper further quoted an Israeli AIDS expert who claimed that Arafat bore all the symptoms of
AIDS, a hypothesis later rejected by the
New York Times. Dr. Ashraf al-Kurdi, personal physician of Arafat for the past 20 years, later declared that nothing in Arafat's medical report mentioned the existence of such a disease. Another "senior Israeli physician" claimed in the
Haaretz article that it was "a classic case of food poisoning", probably caused by a meal eaten four hours before he fell ill on October 12 that may have contained a toxin such as
ricin rather than the standard bacterial poisoning. However, in the same week that the Haaretz report was published, the
New York Times published a separate report also based on access to Arafat's medical records which claimed that it was highly unlikely that Arafat had AIDS or food poisoning. Both
Haaretz and the
New York Times further speculated that the cause of death may have been an infection of an unknown nature or origin. However, rumors of Arafat's poisoning have remained popular especially in the Arab community, but also in the rest of the world. Dr. Ashraf Kurdi, which also follows the
Hashemite kings, lamented the fact that the leader's wife Suha had refused an autopsy, which would have answered many questions in the case. Calling for the creation of an independent commission to carry out investigations concerning Arafat's suspicious death, Dr. al-Kurdi declared to
Haaretz on September 9, 2005 that "any doctor would tell you that these are the symptoms of a poisoning".
[23] Al-Kurdi told the Associated Press that Arafat had the AIDS virus and that "it was given to him to cover up the poison".
[24]
On
November 16,
2004, the
Canard Enchaîné newspaper reported alleged leaks of information unnamed medical sources at
Percy hospital having had access to Arafat and his medical file. According to the newspaper, the doctors at Percy hospital suspected, from Arafat's arrival, grave lesions of the
liver responsible for an alteration of the composition of the blood, thus Arafat was placed in a
hematology service.
Leukemia was soundly ruled out. According to the same source, the reason why this diagnosis of
cirrhosis could not be made public was that, in the mind of the general public, cirrhosis is generally associated with the consequences of
alcohol abuse – even though the diagnosis was not of an alcoholic cirrhosis and Arafat did not consume any alcohol, there would have probably been rumors. The source then explained that Arafat's conditions of life during the last three years did not improve the situation: Arafat did not get health care appropriate to his state. Thus, according to the source, the probable causes of the disease are multiple; Arafat's coma was a consequence of the worsened cirrhosis. Finally, he had a brain
hemorrhage and died on
November 11,
2004.
[25] The French newspaper
Le Monde quoted doctors as saying that he suffered from "an unusual blood disease and a liver problem".
"I wont post any sources, just because you requested me to. As for his wife if you read my post properly like normal humans, you'l see that i said that "I bet ya she was threatend", that was my own personal opinion and i wouldnt be all that surprised if they actually did threaten her :\"
Well according to you, you get your opinion from "is that i read and research for the truth. I posts my arguments based on all the books, facts and all the acedemic writtings that i read concerning this field, and i also reflect my personal opinion on the matter as well." In order for you to come to that conclusion you have to have some sort of source. Personal opinion should and usually does come from knowledge or percieved knowledge. So unless your going to back up what you think or 'reckon' then you should retract it and stop spreading conscpiracies about things you clearly know nothing about.
