velox said:
Yeh you're right not top tier in aus. Conveniently you state the minimum super %. The best I could find was $63k + Super. I guess you could potentially make that to $80k if you counted bonus and potential sign on bonus.
Ok I admit there are no $80k top tier salaries going.
Why do lawyers get paid so little as grads?
Congratulations you have first hand hearsay, does that make you proud? We were talking about salaries and not office size, staff turnover etc. There is no need to display your arrogance here.
I admit to being confused by this post.
Earlier in the thread you stated:
"Really? I dont see engineers getting 80k a year at firms in capital cities...."
This statement asserts that graduates at firms in capital cities in Australia could get 80k (as salary or as a package was not made clear). You stated this point without providing any evidence.
When you were then pressed on this issue, you state, if I have understood you correctly, that the best you could find is 63k + super, which could be "stretched" to 80k. Again you provide no basis for where you obtained this figure, now how such a figure could be "stretched."
In the email above, you then throw in a question about why lawyers get paid "so little" as grads and then you conclude with a personal attack on Frigid.
The personal attack seems to be because Frigid stated that the source of his representation that Jones Day was not a good firm for graduates in Australia was first hand hearsay. Ironically, Frigid at least provided the source for his statement, but you still have not provided any for yours. Perhaps your sources are second hand hearsay?
I am only motivated to press this because I am tired of seeing inaccurate salary figures stated on the internet and in person. Law students really should have a realistic idea of the salary they can expect, and not be lead to believe grossly inflated sums.
Anyway, back to what remains of the late lunch break :/